Volume 13, Number 2 (Pajouhan Scientific Journal, Winter 2015)                   psj 2015, 13(2): 50-56 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Karampourian A, Khatiban M, Jahanghiri K, Razavi Z, Imani B. The effect of using logbook on emergency medical srvices student’s satisfaction and clinical evaluation, in Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2013. psj. 2015; 13 (2) :50-56
URL: http://psj.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-145-en.html

1- Instructor and Member of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2- Member of Research Center for Child & Maternity Care, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , mahnaz.khatiban@gmail.com
3- Associate Professor and Member of Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research, Tehran, Iran
4- Associate Professor and Member of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
5- Instrcutor at Operation Room Group, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Abstract:   (1366 Views)

Introduction: Evaluation is the most sufficient approach to improve the quality of education. In order to reach this goal, there have been many tools that one of them is logbook. Present study aims to estimate the effect of using logbook on students’ satisfaction and clinical evaluation in Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2013.

Methods: In this interventional study, 33 students were involved. The assessment content and face validity of the statistical forms and the questionnaire were approved by the members of the faculty. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was obtained 97.0 for forms and 91.0 for questionnaires. The results were compared. Data was analyzed by SPSS 16 with T-test and Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results: Mean score of students’ satisfaction from evaluation by logbook was 2.55±0.62, mean score of students’ self-evaluation was 2.96±1.03, evaluation score of first instructor was 2.81±1.03, evaluation score of the second instructor was 2.74±1.01and also evaluation score of both instructors was 2.77±1.01. The results showed significant correlation between students’ self-evaluation scores and evaluation scores of both instructors, between students’ satisfaction and their mean self-evaluation scores, between students’ self-evaluation and evaluation score of both instructors and students’ academic marks. However there was a significant inverse correlation, between student’s satisfaction and evaluation score of both instructors (P<0.05).

Conclusion: According to the students’ satisfaction of using logbook and the same scores of self-assessment between students and teachers, one can suggest this approach in clinical education owing to its effectiveness, objectiveness and acceptability.

Full-Text [PDF 316 kb]   (536 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Medicine & Clinical Sciences
Received: 2014/10/4 | Accepted: 2015/01/30 | Published: 2015/09/21

Add your comments about this article : Your username or email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author


© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Pajouhan Scientific Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb