Volume 20, Issue 3 (Pajouhan Scientific Journal, Summer 2022)
Pajouhan Sci J 2022, 20(3): 158-168 |
Back to browse issues page
1- Department of Psychology and Education of Exceptional Children, School of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Psychology, School of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , afrooz@ut.ac.ir
3- Department of Psychology, School of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Psychology, School of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran , afrooz@ut.ac.ir
3- Department of Psychology, School of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (419 Views)
Background and Objectives: Down syndrome causes various problems in children, and this makes this group of children require unique educational and rehabilitation care. The present study aimed to design and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Needs Assessment Questionnaire of Educational and Rehabilitation Problems in Children with Down Syndrome.
Materials and Methods: This study incorporated a combined research method. The statistical population of the qualitative part included Therapists of children with Down Syndrome in 2021 in Isfahan. Twenty therapists were selected intentionally. In the quantitative part, 150 people were selected using random sampling method. The research tools were semi-structured interviews in the qualitative stage, and "Needs Assessment Questionnaire for children with Down syndrome- therapist form" in the quantitative stage. To analyze the data of qualitative part, all interviews were transcribed and the main themes were encoded in several stages. To analyze the data of quantitative part, the content validity, were investigated by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient and retest, respectively.
Results: The results of qualitative analysis of the interviews showed that the needs of these children fall into six categories: cognitive, linguistic, motor, social and emotional, learning and teaching, and daily life skills. The minimum and maximum CVR are 0.8 and 1; CVI was estimated to be 0.97. The results of the correlation of items with the total score of the scale indicate that all items have a significant correlation with the total score. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the existence of 6 factors with acceptable factor load. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was also 0.77. The coefficient of test interval was 0.73.
Conclusions: The results showed that the questionnaire for children with Down syndrome-therapist form" had acceptable psychometric properties and can be used for research and rehabilitation purposes.
Materials and Methods: This study incorporated a combined research method. The statistical population of the qualitative part included Therapists of children with Down Syndrome in 2021 in Isfahan. Twenty therapists were selected intentionally. In the quantitative part, 150 people were selected using random sampling method. The research tools were semi-structured interviews in the qualitative stage, and "Needs Assessment Questionnaire for children with Down syndrome- therapist form" in the quantitative stage. To analyze the data of qualitative part, all interviews were transcribed and the main themes were encoded in several stages. To analyze the data of quantitative part, the content validity, were investigated by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient and retest, respectively.
Results: The results of qualitative analysis of the interviews showed that the needs of these children fall into six categories: cognitive, linguistic, motor, social and emotional, learning and teaching, and daily life skills. The minimum and maximum CVR are 0.8 and 1; CVI was estimated to be 0.97. The results of the correlation of items with the total score of the scale indicate that all items have a significant correlation with the total score. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the existence of 6 factors with acceptable factor load. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was also 0.77. The coefficient of test interval was 0.73.
Conclusions: The results showed that the questionnaire for children with Down syndrome-therapist form" had acceptable psychometric properties and can be used for research and rehabilitation purposes.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Psychology and Psychiatry
Received: 2021/10/9 | Accepted: 2021/12/27 | Published: 2022/09/10
Received: 2021/10/9 | Accepted: 2021/12/27 | Published: 2022/09/10
References
1. Afrooz GhA. An introduction to the psychology and education of exceptional children [in Persian]. Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran; 2018.
2. Afrooz, GhA, Nosrati F. Down syndrome [in Persian]. Tehran, Iran: University of Tehran; 2019.
3. de Graaf G, Buckley F, Skotko BG. Estimates of the live births, natural losses, and elective terminations with Down syndrome in the United States. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167(4):756-67. [DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37001] [PMID]
4. Presson AP, Partyka G, Jensen KM, Devine OJ, Rasmussen SA, McCabe LL, et al. Current estimate of Down syndrome population prevalence in the United States. J Pediatr. 2013;163(4):1163-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.06.013] [PMID]
5. Yamauchi Y, Aoki S, Koike J, Hanzawa N, Hashimoto K. Motor and cognitive development of children with Down syndrome: The effect of acquisition of walking skills on their cognitive and language abilities. Brain Dev. 2019;41(4):320-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2018.11.008] [PMID]
6. Lauteslager PEM, Volman MCJM, Lauteslager T, van den Heuvel ME, Jongerling J, Klugkist IG. Basic motor skills of children with down syndrome: Creating a motor growth curve. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2020;32(4):375-80. [DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000743] [PMID]
7. Mousavi-Sadati SK, Jirsarai-Bazargard M. The effect of superbrin yoga practice on fluid intelligence, spatial vision perception, academic achievement and balance in children with Down syndrome [in Persian], Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 2019;9(36):151-68. [DOI: 10.22054/jpe.2020.44391.2024]
8. Dehghan M, Yadegari F, Sima-Shirazi T, Kazem-Nezhad A. Comparison of reading instruction and traditional methods effects on receptive and expressive language of Down syndrome children [in Persian]. Rehabilitation 2008;9(3-4):51-6.
9. Hemmati S, Pourmohammadreza-Tajrishi M, Rassafiani M, Shirin-bayan P, Koushesh M R, Teimouri R. Comparison of emotional maturity in boys adolescents with Down syndrome (Research in Normal and Exceptional Schools) [in Persian]. Arch Rehabil. 2014;14(Suppl 2):87-92.
10. Ferreira-Vasques AT, Lamônica DAC. Motor, linguistic, personal and social aspects of children with Down syndrome. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015;23(4):424-30. [DOI: 10.1590/1678-775720150102] [PMID]
11. Aslan S, Aslan UB. An evaluation of fine and gross motor skills in adolescents with Down syndromes. Int J Sport Culture Sci. 2016;4(17):172. [DOI: 10.14486/IntJSCS546]
12. Lukowski AF, Milojevich HM, Eales L. Cognitive functioning in children with Down syndrome: current knowledge and future directions. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2019;56:257-89. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2019.01.002] [PMID]
13. Pritchard AE, Kalback S, McCurdy M, Capone GT. Executive functions among youth with Down Syndrome and co‐existing neurobehavioural disorders. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015;59(12):1130-41. [DOI: 10.1111/jir.12217] [PMID]
14. Moradi M, Afrooz GA, Arjomandnia A, Dortaj F, Hakimzadeh R. The effectiveness of teaching functional reading text on reading skills of slow-paced students with Down syndrome [in Persian]. Journal of Psychological Sciences. 2021;19(96):1581-92. [DOI: 20.1001.1.17357462.1399.19.96.11.9]
15. Raghibdoust, S. The ability of children with Down syndrome to understand simple and complex syntactic structures [in Persian]. Persian Language and Literature Quarterly. 2010;13(39):57-76. [DOI: 10.22054/ltr.2009.6479]
16. Muzaffar Zanganeh O, Ferdowsi S. Syntactic indicators in children with Down syndrome [in Persian], Applied Psychology. 2014;7(4):23-44.
17. YaqoubNejad S, Khazeny SM. Social cognition in children and adolescents Down syndrome [in Persian]. J Except Educ. 2013;7(120):37-49.
18. Naqdi N, Qasemzadeh S, Ghobari-Bonab B. Phenomenology of living experiences of mothers with children with Down syndrome [in Persian]. Appl Psychol Res. 2019;10(2):105-18. [DOI: 10.22059/japr.2019.72654]
19. van Duijn G, Dijkxhoorn Y, Scholte EM, van Berckelaer‐Onnes IA. The development of adaptive skills in young people with Down syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010;54(11):943-54. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01316.x] [PMID]
20. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000.
21. Delavar A. Reaserch method in psychology and education [in Persian]. Tehran, Iran: Roshd Publications 2000; pp: 65-71.
22. Saraee H. Introduction on sampling in research [in Persian]. Tehran, Iran: Samt Publications; 1997; pp: 34-7.
23. Dixon JK. Factor analysis. In: Murno BH, editor. Statistical methods for health care research. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2001; pp: 321-50.
24. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-88. [DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687] [PMID]
25. Kim HI, Kim SW, Kim J, Jeon HR, Jung DW. Motor and cognitive developmental profiles in children with Down syndrome. Ann Rehabil Med; 41(1):97-100.
26. Næss KA, Lyster SA, Hulme C, Melby-Lervåg M. Language and verbal short-term memory skills in children with Down syndrome: A meta-analytic review. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(6):2225-34. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.014] [PMID]
27. Tavakoli ZS, Demehri F, Azizi M. Theory of mind teaching on the social competencies and restraint in children of Down syndrome [in Persian]. MEJDS. 2019;9:52. [DOR: 20.1001.1.23222840.1398.9.0.64.6]
28. Guralnick MJ, Connor RT, Johnson LC. Peer-related social competence of young children with Down syndrome. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2011;116(1):48-64. [DOI: 10.1352/1944-7558-116.1.48] [PMID]
29. Will E, Fidler DJ, Daunhauer L, Gerlach‐McDonald B. Executive function and academic achievement in primary–grade students with Down syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017;61(2):181-95. [DOI: 10.1111/jir.12313] [PMID]
30. de Weger C, Boonstra FN, Goossens J. Differences between children with Down syndrome and typically developing children in adaptive behaviour, executive functions and visual acuity. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1-5. [DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85037-4] [PMID]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |