Volume 19, Issue 3 (Pajouhan Scientific Journal, Spring 2021)
Pajouhan Sci J 2021, 19(3): 48-55 |
Back to browse issues page
1- Professor, Research Center for (Home Care) Chronic Diseases, Department of Pediatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran
2- Instructor, Mother and Child Care Research Center, Department of Pediatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran
3- Instructor, Department of Pediatric Nursing, Malayer School of Nursing, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran , Rsharifian7@gmail.com
2- Instructor, Mother and Child Care Research Center, Department of Pediatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran
3- Instructor, Department of Pediatric Nursing, Malayer School of Nursing, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran , Rsharifian7@gmail.com
Abstract: (1358 Views)
Background and Objective: As pain impulses ascend from the spinal cord, the autonomic nervous system is stimulated and leads to changes in physiological parameters. This study aimed to compare the effect of visual and auditory distractions on the physiological parameters during dressing change procedure in children aged 6-12 years.
Materials and Methods: This blinded clinical trial was conducted using a three-group design. In total, 120 children aged 6-12 years met the inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to a control, as well as two visual and auditory distraction groups using the randomized block method. The data were collected using the physiological index record sheet and pulse oximetry device. A cartoon and a rhythmic melody were played for each child in the visual and auditory distraction groups, respectively, two minutes before the onset of the dressing to the end of the dressing change. In all three groups, the heart rate and arterial blood oxygen saturation percentage were measured and recorded during and 5 minutes after dressing change. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 16) through one-way analysis of variance, repeated measures analysis of variance, and Bonferroni post hoc test.
Results: There was a statistically significant difference among the visual, auditory, and control groups regarding the mean heart rate of the children during the dressing changing and 5 minutes later (P˂0.001). Furthermore, the analysis of variance with repeated measures showed a significant difference between the visual and auditory groups in terms of the mean heart rate between the measurement times (P˂0.001). A significant difference was also observed among the visual, auditory, and control groups regarding the mean percentage of arterial blood oxygen saturation in children during dressing change and 5 minutes later (P˂0.001). Analysis of variance with repeated measures revealed a significant difference among the visual, auditory, and control groups in terms of the mean percentage of arterial blood oxygen saturation between the measurement times (P˂0.001).
Conclusion: The use of visual and auditory distractions is a suitable method to reduce the intensity of fluctuations in physiological parameters during dressing change in children with burns. It should be mentioned that out of these two methods, visual distraction was more effective in reducing the intensity of heart rate fluctuations, compared to auditory distraction.
Materials and Methods: This blinded clinical trial was conducted using a three-group design. In total, 120 children aged 6-12 years met the inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to a control, as well as two visual and auditory distraction groups using the randomized block method. The data were collected using the physiological index record sheet and pulse oximetry device. A cartoon and a rhythmic melody were played for each child in the visual and auditory distraction groups, respectively, two minutes before the onset of the dressing to the end of the dressing change. In all three groups, the heart rate and arterial blood oxygen saturation percentage were measured and recorded during and 5 minutes after dressing change. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 16) through one-way analysis of variance, repeated measures analysis of variance, and Bonferroni post hoc test.
Results: There was a statistically significant difference among the visual, auditory, and control groups regarding the mean heart rate of the children during the dressing changing and 5 minutes later (P˂0.001). Furthermore, the analysis of variance with repeated measures showed a significant difference between the visual and auditory groups in terms of the mean heart rate between the measurement times (P˂0.001). A significant difference was also observed among the visual, auditory, and control groups regarding the mean percentage of arterial blood oxygen saturation in children during dressing change and 5 minutes later (P˂0.001). Analysis of variance with repeated measures revealed a significant difference among the visual, auditory, and control groups in terms of the mean percentage of arterial blood oxygen saturation between the measurement times (P˂0.001).
Conclusion: The use of visual and auditory distractions is a suitable method to reduce the intensity of fluctuations in physiological parameters during dressing change in children with burns. It should be mentioned that out of these two methods, visual distraction was more effective in reducing the intensity of heart rate fluctuations, compared to auditory distraction.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Medicine & Clinical Sciences
Received: 2021/06/14 | Accepted: 2021/05/31 | Published: 2021/05/31
Received: 2021/06/14 | Accepted: 2021/05/31 | Published: 2021/05/31
References
1. Kaheni S, Sadegh Rezai M, Bagheri-Nesami M, Goudarzian AH. The effect of distraction technique on the pain of dressing change among 3-6 year-old children. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;4(4):1603-10.
2. Gururaj G. Injury prevention and care: an important public health agenda for health, survival and safety of children. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2013;80(1):100-8. [DOI:10.1007/s12098-012-0783-z] [PMID]
3. Hakimi H, Shafipoor SZ, Kazem Nezhad Leili E. Characteristics of burn children in Guilan Province. Journal of Holistic Nursing And Midwifery. 2012;22(1):9-15.
4. Gandhi M, Thomson C, Lord D, Enoch S. Management of pain in children with burns. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2010;2010:825657. [DOI:10.1155/2010/825657] [PMID] []
5. Rezai M, Shahmohammadi S. Nosocomial infections in Iranian pediatric patients with burn injuries: a review. Journal of Pediatrics Reviw. 2015;3(2):1-11. [DOI:10.17795/jpr-680]
6. Brown NJ, Rodger S, Ware RS, Kimble RM, Cuttle L. Efficacy of a children's procedural preparation and distraction device on healing in acute burn wound care procedures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012;13(1):238-49. [DOI:10.1186/1745-6215-13-238] [PMID] []
7. Kahar NA, Kanageswari, Tay YB, Koh KX. A pilot study of the effects of music listening for pain relief among burns patients. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare. 2011; 20(3):162-73. [DOI:10.1177/201010581102000305]
8. Doenges ME, Moorhouse MF, Murr AC. Nursing care plans: guidelines for individualizing client care across the life span. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 2019.
9. Kassam-Adams N, Palmieri PA, Rork K, Delahanty DL, Kenardy J, Kohser KL, et al. Acute stress symptoms in children: Results from an international data archive. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.2012;51(8):812-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.jaac.2012.05.013] [PMID] []
10. Saleh AH, Hassan PF. The prophylactic effect of rectal diclofenac versus intravenous pethidine on postoperative pain after tonsillectomy in children. Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology. 2019;11(1):1-7. [DOI:10.1186/s42077-018-0017-3]
11. Jiang M, Mieronkoski R, Syrjälä E, Anzanpour A, Terävä V, Rahmani AM, et al. Acute pain intensity monitoring with the classification of multiple physiological parameters. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing. 2019;33(3):493-507. [DOI:10.1007/s10877-018-0174-8] [PMID] []
12. Ballantyne JC, Fishman SM, Rathmell JP. Bonica's management of pain. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2018.
13. Vosoghi N, Chehrzad M, Abotalebi G, Atrkar Roshan Z. Effects of distraction on physiologic indices and pain intensity in children aged 3-6 undergoing IV injection. Journal of Hayat. 2011;16(3):39-47.
14. Walker SM. Biological and neurodevelopmental implications of neonatal pain. Clinics in Perinatology. 2013;40(3):471-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.clp.2013.05.002] [PMID]
15. Ladwig GB, Ackley BJ, Makic MB. Mosby's guide to nursing diagnosis e-book. New York: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019.
16. Pickering G, Zwakhalen S, Kaasalainen S. Pain management in older adults: a nursing perspective. Berlin: Springer International Publishing; 2018. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-71694-7]
17. Edmond SN, Becker WC, Driscoll MA, Decker SE, Higgins DM, Mattocks KM, et al. Use of non-pharmacological pain treatment modalities among veterans with chronic pain: results from a cross sectional survey. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2018;33(1):54-60. [DOI:10.1007/s11606-018-4322-0] [PMID] []
18. Shaban MA, Rasoolzadeh N, Mehran AB, Moradalizadeh F. Study of two non-pharmacological methods, progressive muscle relaxation and music, on pain relief of cancerous patients. Journal of Hayat. 2006;12(3):63-72.
19. Jacobson AF. Cognitive-behavioral interventions for IV insertion pain. AORN Journal. 2006;84(6):1031-48. [DOI:10.1016/S0001-2092(06)64000-3] [PMID]
20. Rodriguez ST, Jang O, Hernandez JM, George AJ, Caruso TJ, Simons LE. Varying screen size for passive video distraction during induction of anesthesia in low‐risk children: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Anesthesia. 2019; 29(6):648-55. [DOI:10.1111/pan.13636] [PMID]
21. Mikaeili N, Fathi A, Kanani S, Samadifard HR. A comparison of distraction techniques (bubble and cartoon) on reducing chemotherapy induced pain in children with cancer. Iranian Journal of Cancer Nursing. 2019;1(1):15-23. [DOI:10.29252/ijca.1.1.15]
22. Abd Elnabi H, El-Dakhakhny A, Fikry Mehanna A. Effect of distraction techniques on minimizing pain associated with burn dressing changes among preschool children. IOSRJNHS. 2018;7(2):64-78.
23. Babaie M, Shirinabadi Farahani A, Nourian M, Pourhoseingholi A, Masoumpoor A. Pain management using distraction in school-age children. Iranian Journal of Nursing Research. 2015;10(3):71-80.
24. Rodriguez ST, Jang O, Hernandez JM, George AJ, Caruso TJ, Simons LE. Varying screen size for passive video distraction during induction of anesthesia in low‐risk children: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Anesthesia. 2019; 29(6):648-55. [DOI:10.1111/pan.13636] [PMID]
25. Hua Y, Qiu R, Yao WY, Zhang Q, Chen XL. The effect of virtual reality distraction on pain relief during dressing changes in children with chronic wounds on lower limbs. Pain Management Nursing. 2015;16(5):685-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2015.03.001] [PMID]
26. Sabzevari AR, Kianifar HR, Jafari SA, Saeidi M, Ahanchian H, Kiani MA, et al. The effect of music on pain and vital signs of children before and after Endoscopy. Electronic Physician. 2017;9(7):4801-5. [DOI:10.19082/4801] [PMID] []
27. Hoseini T, Golaghaei F, Khosravi S. Comparison of two distraction methods on venipuncture pain in children. Journal of Arak University of Medical Sciences. 2019;22(3):28-35.
28. Cheraghi F, Afshari Z, Tapak L, Sabouri T, Sadeghian E. The effect of mothers' voice on preterm neonates' physiological parameters. Avicenna Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Care. 2017;25(4):95-103. [DOI:10.30699/sjhnmf.25.4.95]
29. Safari N, Sabzaligol M, Naseri Salahshouri V, Latifi M, Kouhestani H, Baghcheghi N. The effects of music on pain of heel blood sampling in infants. Iranian Journal of Nursing Research. 2016;11(4):43-7. [DOI:10.21859/ijnr-110405]
30. Karimi R, Shabani F, Dehghan Nayeri N, Zareii K, Khalili G, Chehrazi M. Effect of music therapy on physiological pain responses of blood sampling in premature infants. Journal of Hayat. 2012;18(2):76-86.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |