Volume 16, Issue 1 (Pajouhan Scientific Journal, Autumn 2017)                   psj 2017, 16(1): 42-48 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Julaieha S, Zare H, Mousavi S. Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of the Meta- Parenting Questionnaire. psj. 2017; 16 (1) :42-48
URL: http://psj.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-298-en.html
1- PhD student, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Payame Noor, Tehran, Iran. , njulaieha@yahoo.com
2- PhD, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Payame Noor, Tehran, Iran.
3- MSc, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran.
Abstract:   (3350 Views)
Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to introduce the basic structure of the meta-parenting questionnaire as well as providing new tools designed to measure the reliability of the structure, and the results of empirical research early.
Materials and Methods: This study is a descriptive survey and is a part of research development. The statistical population is all the mothers in Tehran Region 15, in which 200 were selected by the purposive sampling method in 2015-2016. The final questionnaire on 170 women between the ages of 20 and 55 years was conducted. To obtain reliability, Cronbach's alpha, Tansif, and Gotmann was used and for the validity of the Pearson correlation coefficients between short- and long-form meta-parenting questionnaires was used and also for softening scores to Z scores and the scores of T converted.  Finally, data were analyzed using SPSS 23 software.
Results: KMO test become equal to 0.88 and at optimal levels and Bartlett test of sphericity was statistically significant. There are four factors in factor analysis confirmed 63.38% of the total variance explained scale. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the results of exploratory factor analysis and model fitting was obtained with research data. 
Conclusions: The questionnaire appears to be an important aspect of the development of constructive and good parenting skills to foster the development of children is very important.
Full-Text [PDF 639 kb]   (1080 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Psychology and Psychiatry
Received: 2016/12/24 | Accepted: 2017/04/14 | Published: 2017/11/24

1. 1. Zubrick,S. Parenting and families Australia. Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs: LSAC Research Consortium Social Policy Research Paper 2008; 34:1-216 [DOI]
2. 2. Miller SA. Parents’ attributions for their children’s behavior. Child Development. 1995;66(6):1557–1584. DOI: 10.2307/1131897. [DOI]
3. 3. Hoza B, Owens JS, Pelham WE, Swanson JM, Conners CK, Hinshaw SP, Arnold LE, Kraemer HC. Parent cognitions as predictors of child treatment response in attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder. Journal of abnormal child psychology. 2000;28(6):569–583. PMID: 11104318. [DOI]
4. 4. Mah JW, Johnston C. Parental social cognitions: considerations in the acceptability of and engagement in behavioral parent training. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2008;11(4):218–236. DOI: 10.1007/s10567-008-0038-8. [DOI]
5. 5. Maloney R, Altmaier E. An initial evaluation of a mindful parenting program. J Clin Psychol2007; 63(12):1231–1238. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20395. [DOI]
6. 6. Russell C. becoming a better parent: Canada’s most neglected transition. Invest in Kids conference presentation. 2008; 27 August, Melbourne. [DOI]
7. 7. Melhuish E, Phan M, Sylva K, Sammons P, Siraj-Blatchford I, Taggart B. Effects of the Home Learning Environment and Preschool Center Experience upon Literacy and Numeracy Development in Early Primary School. Journal of Social Issues. 2008;64(1):95–114. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00550.x. [DOI]
9. 8. Fogel A, King B, Shanker S. (eds). Human Development in the 21st Century, [DOI]
10. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge UK; 2009. [DOI]
11. 9. Patterson G R, Stouthamer-Loeber M. The correlation of family management practices and delinquency. Child Development. 1984; 55(4): 1299–1307. PMID: 6488958. [DOI]
12. 10. Oates J. Attachment relationships: Quality of Care for Young Children, Early Childhood in Focus, series 1, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK ;2007. [DOI]
13. 11. Halfon N, Schulman E, Hochstein M. Brain Development in Early Childhood. UCLA Centre for Healthier Children, Families and Communities, California, 2001;1(24): 1-89. [DOI]
14. 12. Sylva K, Melhuish E, Sammons P, Siraj-Blatchford I, Taggart B. Effective Provision of Pre-School Education (EPPE) Project: Findings from Pre-school to end of Key Stage 1; 2004. [DOI]
15. 13. Lexmond J, Reeves R. Building character: Parents are the principal architects of a fairer society. DEMOS: London; 2009. [DOI]
16. 14. Goodnow J. Parents’ ideas, actions, and feelings: Models and methods from developmental and social psychology. Child Development. 1988;59(2): 286–320. DOI: 10.2307/1130312. [DOI]
17. 15. Sigel IE, McGillicuddy-De Lisi AV. Parent beliefs are cognitions: The dynamic belief systems model. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting: Being and becoming a parent. 2000; 485-508. [DOI]
18. 16. Holden G W, Hawk CK. Meta-parenting in the journey of childrearing: A cognitive mechanism for change. In L. Kuczynski (Ed.), Handbook of dynamics in parentchild relations 2003; 189–210. [DOI]
19. 17. Hawk C K, Holden GW. Meta-parenting: An initial investigation into a new parental social cognition construct. Parenting: Science and Practice. 2006; 6(4):321–342. DOI:10.1207/s15327922par0604_3. [DOI]
20. 18. Wong, Wai-lap, Lance. How do parents think about and evaluate childrearing issues? exploring patterns of meta-parenting and their characteristics. Dissertação de Mestrado não publicada, Programa de Pós-Graduaçãoem Filosofia, Universidade de Hong Kong (Pokfulam [DOI]
21. Road, Hong Kong, 2011). [DOI]
22. 19. Eaton WO, Enns LR. Sex differences in human motor activity level. Psychological Bulletin.1986;100(1), 19–28. PMID: 3526375. [DOI]
23. 20. Han U. Culturally Responsive Construct of Meta-Parenting: Validation of corean Meta -Parenting Questionnaire. The Korean Journal of Community Living Science. 2010;21(4):499-507 [DOI]
24. 21. Tamm L, Holden GW, Nakonezny PA, Swart S, Hughes CW. Met parenting: associations with parenting stress, child-rearing practices, and retention in parents of children at risk for ADHD. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders. 2012;(4):1–10. DOI 10.1007/s12402-011-0068-9. [DOI]
25. 22. Hawk CK. The social-cognitive underpinnings of effective caregiving. http://hdl.handle.net/2007; 2152/13245. [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2020 All Rights Reserved | Pajouhan Scientific Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb