Volume 17, Issue 4 (Pajouhan Scientific Journal, Summer 2019)                   psj 2019, 17(4): 8-13 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Farsi D, Zohri D, Abbasi S, Hessam R, Navkhasi S, Saifpanahi J. Comparison of the Diagnostic Values of Four-Point and Two-point Ultrasound Versus CT Scan in Determining Pneumothorax. psj. 2019; 17 (4) :8-13
URL: http://psj.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-509-en.html
1- Associate Professor, Emergency Medicine, Iran University of medical science, Tehran, Iran
2- Emergency Medicine Specialist, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran , darabzohri@gmail.com
3- Emergency Medicine Specialist, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
4- Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Asadabad School of Medical Sciences, Asadabad, Iran
5- Department of Nursing, Kowsar Hospital, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
Abstract:   (229 Views)
Background and Objectives: Pneumothorax is a life-threatening complication and the most common cause of which is trauma. Early diagnosis and treatment of Pneumothorax are very important. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic values of four-point and double-point ultrasound versus CT scan in determining pneumothorax in Rasul-Akram and Hafte-Tir Hospitals during the years 2015 - 2016.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 880 trauma patients that selected randomly from the emergency department. The study information was completed based on two-point US and four-point US and the patients’ file records. CT scan, as the gold standard for the diagnosis of pneumothorax, was used for all patients. The crosstab test was used for evaluating the accuracy of two methods and to determine the Kappa coefficient level of agreement. Data were analyzed using SPSS v.16 software.
Results: The sensitivity of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pneumothorax in the two-point technique group was 91.1%, with a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 97.7%. The accuracy in this method was 95.5%. In the four-point technique, the sensitivity was 98.9%, with a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 99.7%. The accuracy in this method was 99.4%.
Conclusions: The four-point chest ultrasound is a high accuracy method for the bedside diagnosis of pneumothorax in patients with trauma.
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Medicine & Clinical Sciences
Received: 2019/07/3 | Accepted: 2019/09/3

1. Ghane M, Sabori E, Sabori A. diagnostic accurancy of general physician versus emergancy medicine specialist in interpretation of chest X-ray suspected for iatrogenic pnoeumothorax:a brief report. Tehran university medical journal. 2011;69(12):799-803.
2. Moore FO, Goslar PW, Coimbra R, Velmahos G, Brown CV, Coopwood Jr TB, et al. Blunt traumatic occult pneumothorax: is observation safe?—results of a prospective, AAST multicenter study. 2011;70(5):1019-25.b
3. Rosen P, Marx JA, Hockberger RS, Walls RM, Adams J. Rosen's emergency medicine : concepts and clinical practice. Vol. 3. Vol. 3. Philadelphia, Pa.: Mosby Elsevier; 2006.
4. Knox S, Madruga M, Carlan SJ. Utilizing Abdominal Sonography in the Diagnosis of Ascites Caused by Heart Failure: A Patient With Cirrhosis. 2018;34(1):50-2.
5. Grimberg A, Shigueoka DC, Atallah AN, Ajzen S, Iared W. Diagnostic accuracy of sonography for pleural effusion: systematic review. Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina. 2010;128(2):90-5.
6. Knudtson JL, Dort JM, Helmer SD, Smith RS. Surgeon-performed ultrasound for pneumothorax in the trauma suite. The Journal of trauma. 2004;56(3):527-30.
7. Garofalo G, Busso M, Perotto F, De Pascale A, Fava C. Ultrasound diagnosis of pneumothorax. La Radiologia medica. 2006;111(4):516-25.
8. Reissig A, Kroegel C. Accuracy of transthoracic sonography in excluding post-interventional pneumothorax and hydropneumothorax. Comparison to chest radiography. European journal of radiology. 2005;53(3):463-70.
9. Kaya Ş, Çevik AA, Acar N, Döner E, Sivrikoz C, Özkan R. A study on the evaluation of pneumothorax by imaging methods in patients presenting to the emergency department for blunt thoracic trauma. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015;21(5):366-72.
10. Dulchavsky SA, Schwarz KL, Kirkpatrick AW, Billica RD, Williams DR, Diebel LN, et al. Prospective evaluation of thoracic ultrasound in the detection of pneumothorax. The Journal of trauma. 2001;50(2):201-5.
11. Brook OR, Beck-Razi N, Abadi S, Filatov J, Ilivitzki A, Litmanovich D, et al. Sonographic detection of pneumothorax by radiology residents as part of extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma. Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2009;28(6):749-55.
12. Gerscovich EO, Cronan M, McGahan JP, Jain K, Jones CD, McDonald C. Ultrasonographic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion. Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2001;20(6):597-604.
13. Rowan KR, Kirkpatrick AW, Liu D, Forkheim KE, Mayo JR, Nicolaou S. Traumatic pneumothorax detection with thoracic US: correlation with chest radiography and CT--initial experience. Radiology. 2002;225(1):210-4.
14. Zhang M, Liu Z-H, Yang J-X, Gan J-X, Xu S-W, You X-D, et al. Rapid detection of pneumothorax by ultrasonography in patients with multiple trauma. Crit Care. 2006;10(4):R112-R.
15. Ianniello S, Di Giacomo V, Sessa B, Miele V. First-line sonographic diagnosis of pneumothorax in major trauma: accuracy of e-FAST and comparison with multidetector computed tomography. La Radiologia medica. 2014;119(9):674-80.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

© 2019 All Rights Reserved | Pajouhan Scientific Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb