1. Swartz EN. Is indomethacin or ibuprofen better for medical closure of the patent ductus arteriosus? Arch Dis Child. 2003; 88(12): 1134-1135.
2. Lago P, Bettiol T, Salvadori S, et al. Safety and efficacy of ibuprofen versus indomethacin in preterm infants treated for patent ductus arteriosus: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2002; 161(4): 202-207.
3. Supapannachart S, Limrungsikul A, Khowsathit P. Oral ibuprofen and indomethacin for treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants: a randomized trial at Ramathibodi Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002; 85 Suppl 4: S1252-1258.
4. Koch J, Hensley G, Roy L, et al. Prevalence of spontaneous closure of the ductus arteriosus at a birth weight of 1000 grams or less. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(4): 1113-1121.
5. Bose CL, Laughon M. Treatment to prevent patency of the ductus arteriosus: beneficial or harmful? J Pediatr. 2006; 148(6): 713-4.
6. Bose CL, Laughon MM. Patent ductus arteriosus: lack of evidence for common treatments. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007; 92(6):F498-502.
7. Herrman K, Bose CL, Lewis K, Laughon M. Spontaneous closure of the patent ductus arteriosus in very low birth weight infants following discharge from the neonatal unit. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009; 94(1): F48-50.
8. Teixeira LS, McNamara PJ. Enhanced intensive care for the neonatal ductus arteriosus. Acta Paediatr. 2006; 95(4): 394-403.
9. Clyman RI. Mechanisms regulating the ductus arteriosus. Biol Neonate. 2006; 89(4): 330-5.
10. Hermes-DeSantis ER, Clyman RI. Patent ductus arteriosus: pathophysiology and management. J Perinatol. 2006; 26 Suppl 1: S14-8.
11. McCurnin D, Clyman RI. Effect of a patent ductus arteriosus on postprandial mesenteric perfusion in premature baboons. Pediatrics. 2008; 122(6): e1262-7.
12. Lemmers PMA, Toet MC, van Bel F. Impact of patent ductus arteriosus and subsequent therapy with indomethacin on cerebral oxygenation in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2008; 121(1): 142-7.
13. Bose CL, Laughon M. Treatment to prevent patency of the ductus arteriosus: beneficial or harmful? J Pediatr. 2006; 148(6): 713-4.
14. Malcolm WF, Hornik C, Evans A, et al. Vocal fold paralysis following surgical ductal closure in extremely low birth weight infants: a case series of feeding and respiratory complications. J Perinatol. 2008; 28(11): 782-5.
15. Kabra N, Schmidt B, Roberts R, et al. Neurosensory impairment after surgical closure of patent ductus arteriosus in extremely low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2007; 150(3): 229-34.
16. Chorne N, Leonard C, Piecuch R, Clyman RI. Patent ductus arteriosus and its treatment as risk factors for neonatal and neurodevelopmental morbidity. Pediatrics. 2007; 119(6): 1165-74.
17. Raval MV, Laughon MM, Bose CL, Phillips JD. Patent ductus arteriosus ligation in premature infants: who really benefits, and at what cost? J Pediatr Surg. 2007; 42(1): 69-75.
18. Clyman RI, Chorne N. Patent Ductus Arteriosus: Evidence for and against treatment. J Pediatr. 2007; 150(3): 216-9.
19. Chang LY, McCurnin D, Yoder B, et al. Ductus arteriosus ligation and alveolar growth in preterm baboons with a patent ductus arteriosus. Pediatr Res. 2008; 63(3): 299-302.
20. Van Overmeire B, Smets K, Lecoutere D. A comparison of ibuprofen and indomethacin for closure of patent ductus arteriosus. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343(10): 674-81.
21. Thomas RL, Parker GC, Van Overmeire B, Aranda J. A meta-analysis of ibuprofen versus indomethacin for closure of patent ductus arteriosus. Eur J Pediatr. 2005; 164(3): 135-40.
22. Desfrere L, Zohar S, Morville P, et al. Dose-finding study of ibuprofen in patent ductus arteriosus using the continual reassessment method. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2005; 30(2): 121-32.
23. Jegatheesan P, Ianus V, Buchh B, et al. Increased indomethacin dosing for persistent patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2008; 153(2): 183-9.
24. Weiss H, Cooper B, Brook M, et al. Factors determining reopening of the ductus arteriosus after successful clinical closure with indome-thacin. J Pediatr. 1995; 127(3): 466-71.
25. Shaffer CL, Gal P, Ransom JL, et al. Effect of age and birth weight on indomethacin pharmacodynamics in neonates treated for patent ductus arteriosus. Crit Care Med. 2002; 30(2): 343-8.
26. Hammerman C, Bin-Nun A, Markowitz E, et al. Ductal closure with paracetamol: a surprising new approach to patent ductus arteriosus treatment. Pediatrics. 2011; 128(6): e1618-21.
27. Dang D, Wang D, Zhang C, Zhou W, Zhou Q, Wu H. Comparison of oral paracetamol versus ibuprofen in premature infants with patent ductus arteriosus: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013; 8(11): e77888.
28. Erdeve O, Yurttutan S, Altug N, Ozdemir R, Gokmen T, Dilmen U, et al. Oral versus intravenous ibuprofen for patent ductus arteriosus closure: a randomised controlled trial in extremely low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012; 97(4): F279-83.
29. Hossain J, Shabuj MK. Oral paracetamol versus intravenous paracetamol in the closure of patent ductus arteriosus: A proportion meta-analysis. J Clin Neonatol 2018;7:121-4
30. Terrin G, Conte F, Scipione A, Bacchio E, Conti MG, Ferro R, et al. Efficacy of paracetamol for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm neonates. Ital J Pediatr. 2014; 40(1): 21.
31. Yurttutan S, Oncel MY, Arayici S, Uras N, Altug N, Erdeve O, et al. A different first-choice drug in the medical management of patent ductus arteriosus: oral paracetamol. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013; 26(8): 825-7.
32. Dang D, Wang D, Zhang C, Zhou W, Zhou Q, Wu H. Comparison of oral paracetamol versus ibuprofen in premature infants with patent ductus arteriosus: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013; 8(11): e77888.
33. Oncel MY, Yurttutan S, Erdeve O, Uras N, Altug N, Oguz SS, et al. Oral paracetamol versus oral ibuprofen in the management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2014;164(3):510–4 e1.
34. Sinha R, Negi V, Dalal SS. An Interesting Observation of PDA Closure with Oral Paracetamol in Preterm Neonates. J Clin Neonatol. 2013; 2(1): 30-2.