Pajouhan Scientific Journal, Winter, In Press
Back to the articles list |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: IR.MUMS.FHMPM.REC.1403.125
Zahra Khoshkharam #1 
, Bahareh Behrouzi #1 , Elaheh Lael-Monfared2 , Alireza Jafari3 , Mehrsadat Mahdizadeh *4
, Bahareh Behrouzi #1 , Elaheh Lael-Monfared2 , Alireza Jafari3 , Mehrsadat Mahdizadeh *4
1- Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran & Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran & Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Nursing Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
4- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran & Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran ,Mahdizadehtm@mums.ac.ir
2- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran & Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Public Health, Nursing Research Center, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran
4- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran & Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran ,
Abstract: (648 Views)
(# Contributed equally as the first author)
Background and Objectives: Animal bites are a major health problem and threat. This study aimed to apply the theory of protective motivation, which is based on protective and preventive behaviors. It was also attempted to evaluate the factors affecting the intention to prevent animal bites among elementary school students.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted using a multistage random sampling method on 400 elementary school students (7 to 12 years old) from October to December 2024 in Mashhad. The data collection tool included two sections of a demographic information form and questions related to the constructs of the theory of protective motivation, which were designed by the researchers in a pilot study. It should be mentioned that the validity and reliability of them were confirmed. The data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 26) through descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and analytical statistics, including Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression. The significant statistical level of 0.05 was considered.
Results: In total, 47.3% of the students were female, and 79% of them had no history of animal bites. The mean age of the participants was 9.5±0.9 years. The results of the Pearson correlation coefficient test showed a direct and significant correlation among the constructs of perceived sensitivity (P<0.01, r=0.482), perceived severity (P<0.01, r=0.266), response efficacy (P<0.01, r=0.509), self-efficacy (P<0.01, r=0.639), and fear (P<0.05, r=0.122) with the motivation to protect or the intention to prevent animal bites. Additionally, there was an inverse and significant correlation between the constructs of perceived response cost (P<0.01, r=0.249) and perceived reward (P<0.01, r=0.176) and the motivation to engage in animal bite prevention behaviors. The results of linear regression for predictors of intention to protect animal bite behaviors showed that the constructs of self-efficacy, perceived sensitivity, and reward were significant predictors of intention to prevent animal bite and were able to predict 43.5% of its variance. Self-efficacy (β=0.478, P<0.001) was the strongest predictor of intention to protect against animal bites.
Conclusion: The constructs of the theory of protection motivation can be effective in promoting students' intention to adopt animal bite prevention behaviors. It is suggested that the constructs of this theory of behavior change be used in the design and implementation of interventions to empower students to adopt animal bite prevention behaviors.
Background and Objectives: Animal bites are a major health problem and threat. This study aimed to apply the theory of protective motivation, which is based on protective and preventive behaviors. It was also attempted to evaluate the factors affecting the intention to prevent animal bites among elementary school students.
Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted using a multistage random sampling method on 400 elementary school students (7 to 12 years old) from October to December 2024 in Mashhad. The data collection tool included two sections of a demographic information form and questions related to the constructs of the theory of protective motivation, which were designed by the researchers in a pilot study. It should be mentioned that the validity and reliability of them were confirmed. The data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 26) through descriptive (mean and standard deviation) and analytical statistics, including Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression. The significant statistical level of 0.05 was considered.
Results: In total, 47.3% of the students were female, and 79% of them had no history of animal bites. The mean age of the participants was 9.5±0.9 years. The results of the Pearson correlation coefficient test showed a direct and significant correlation among the constructs of perceived sensitivity (P<0.01, r=0.482), perceived severity (P<0.01, r=0.266), response efficacy (P<0.01, r=0.509), self-efficacy (P<0.01, r=0.639), and fear (P<0.05, r=0.122) with the motivation to protect or the intention to prevent animal bites. Additionally, there was an inverse and significant correlation between the constructs of perceived response cost (P<0.01, r=0.249) and perceived reward (P<0.01, r=0.176) and the motivation to engage in animal bite prevention behaviors. The results of linear regression for predictors of intention to protect animal bite behaviors showed that the constructs of self-efficacy, perceived sensitivity, and reward were significant predictors of intention to prevent animal bite and were able to predict 43.5% of its variance. Self-efficacy (β=0.478, P<0.001) was the strongest predictor of intention to protect against animal bites.
Conclusion: The constructs of the theory of protection motivation can be effective in promoting students' intention to adopt animal bite prevention behaviors. It is suggested that the constructs of this theory of behavior change be used in the design and implementation of interventions to empower students to adopt animal bite prevention behaviors.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Health Sciences
Received: 2025/10/21 | Accepted: 2026/03/4
Received: 2025/10/21 | Accepted: 2026/03/4
References
1. Obonyo M, Akoko JM, Orinde AB, Osoro E, Boru WG, Njeru I, et al. Suspected rabies in humans and animals, Laikipia county, Kenya. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 22(3): 551-3. [DOI:10.3201/eid2203.151118] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Ayubi E, Shirzadi MR, Amiri B, Pourmozafari J, Faghih Soleimani M, Khosronejad S, et al. Exploring the spatial pattern of animal bites in Iran (2021-2022). Prev Vet Med. 2023;221:106056. [DOI:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.106056] [PMID]
3. Shakerian S and Sadraei M. Epidemiology of animal bite in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Res Med Sci. 2023;28(1):59. [DOI:10.4103/jrms.jrms_190_22] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Manning SE, Rupprecht CE, Fishbein D, Hanlon CA, Lumlertdacha B, Guerra M, et al. Human rabies prevention--United States, 2008: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2008;57(Rr-3):1-28.
5. Amiri M, Khosravi A. Animal Bites Epidemiology in Shahroud City. Knowl Health. 2009;4(3):41-43.
6. Sabouri Ghannad M. Animal bites in borujerd: An overview of animal bites in iran. Avicenna J Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014. [DOI:10.17795/ajcmi-19568]
7. Nadin-Davis SA, Simani S, Armstrong J, Fayaz A, Wandeler AI. Molecular and antigenic characterization of rabies viruses from Iran identifies variants with distinct epidemiological origins. Epidemiol Infect. 2003;131(1):777-90. [DOI:10.1017/S095026880300863X] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Mohammadzadeh A, Mahmoodi P, Sharif A, Moafi M, Erfani H, Siavashi M. A three-year epidemiological study of animal bites and rabies in Hamedan Province of Iran. Avicenna J Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;9;4(2):45031-45031. [DOI:10.5812/ajcmi.45031]
9. Abedi M, Doosti-Irani A, Jahanbakhsh F, Sahebkar A. Epidemiology of animal bite in Iran during a 20-year period (1993-2013): A Meta-analysis. Trop Med Health. 2019;47:55. [DOI:10.1186/s41182-019-0182-5] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Alavinia SM, Yaghubi M, Rajabzadeh R, Seyed SS. An epidemiologic study of animal bites in North Khorasan Province, Iran, from 2005 to 2011.J Occup Health Epidemiol. 2014;3(1):1-6. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.johe.3.1.1]
11. Hamidzadeh AY, Rezakhani H, Savadpoure MT, Nakhostine B, Haji GM, Babai Y, et al. Impact of health education on incidence of animal bites and knowledge on rabies and preventive behaviors in selected villages of Ardabil city. J Health. 2013;4:84-93.
12. Sharafi A, Tarrahi M, Saki M, Sharafi M, Nasiri E, Mokhayeri H. Epidemiological study of animal bites and rabies in Lorestan Province in west of Iran during 2004-2014 for preventive purposes. Int J Prev Med. 2016;7:104. [DOI:10.4103/2008-7802.190090] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Eslamifar A, Ramezani A, Razaghi AM, Falahian V, Mashayekhi P, Hazrati M, et al. Animal bites in Tehran, Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2008;11:200-2.
14. Ebrahimi M, Mohammadi Zeidi I, Maleki MR, Mohammadi Zeidi B. Explaining the psychological variables effective on pro-environmental behavior in the elementary school students at Qazvin city: application of the theory of planned behavior. Pajouhan Sci J. 2024;22(1):55-67. [DOI:10.61186/psj.22.1.55]
15. Baghiani-Moghadam MH, Seyedi-Andi SJ, Shokri-Shirvani J, Khafri S, Ghadimi R, Parsian H. Efficiency of two constructs called "fear of disease" and "perceived severity of disease" on the prevention of gastric cancer: Application of protection motivation theory. Caspian J Intern Med. 2015;6(4):201-8.
16. Tulloch H, Reida R, D'Angeloa MS, Plotnikoff RC, Morrina L, Beatona L, et al. Predicting short and long-term exercise intentions and behaviour in patients with coronary artery disease: A test of protection motivation theory. Psychol Health. 2009;24(3):255-69. [DOI:10.1080/08870440701805390] [PMID]
17. Babazadeh T, Nadrian H, Banayejeddi M, Rezapour B. Determinants of skin cancer preventive behaviors among rural farmers in Iran: An application of protection motivation theory. J Cancer Educ. 2017;32(3):604-612. [DOI:10.1007/s13187-016-1004-7] [PMID]
18. Li Q, Liu Q, Chen X, Tan X, Zhang M, Tuo J, et al. Protection motivation theory in predicting cervical cancer screening participation: A longitudinal study in rural Chinese women. Psychooncology. 2020;29(3):564-571. [DOI:10.1002/pon.5307] [PMID]
19. Ghahremani L, Faryabi R, Kaveh MH. Effect of health education based on the protection motivation theory on malaria preventive behaviors in rural households of kerman, Iran. Int J Prev Med. 2014;5(4):463-71.
20. Laorujisawat M, Wattanaburanon A, Abdullakasim P, Maharachpong N. Protection motivation theory and rabies protective behaviors among school students in Chonburi Province, Thailand. J Prev Med Public Health. 2021;54(6):431-440. [DOI:10.3961/jpmph.21.457] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Janeaim N, Intarakamhang U, Suwanwong C. Child-centered rabies prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis of behavioral determinants and intervention effectiveness(2015-2024). J One Health.
22. Woldegeorgis BZ, Genebo AP, Gebrekidan AY, Kassie GA, Azeze GA, Asgedom YS. Knowledge, attitudes and prevention practices related to dog-mediated rabies in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational epidemiological studies from inception to 2023. Front Public Health. 2023:1276859. [DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1276859] [PMID] [PMCID]
23. Laorujisawat M, Nakpan W, Prasertchai A, Thammakun T, Punsombut V, Suwannahong K. Strengthening rabies protection behaviors among Thai children: the role of health literacy and protection motivation. J Sch Health.2025;95(11):933-943. [DOI:10.1111/josh.70059] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Fakhar M, Abdollahi M, Tajfard M, Jamali J, Mahdiadeh M. Assessing preventive behaviors of leishmaniasis in health ambassadors: application of cognitive-social theory. Med J Mashhad Univ Med Sci. 2022;65 (2):680-691.
25. Mostafayi M, Imeni B. Exploration of risk factors threatening the health of mother, fetus, and infant in cesarean delivery: a grounded theoretical study.Pajouhan Sci J. 2022;20(2):64-72. [DOI:10.61186/psj.20.2.64]
26. Laorujisawat M, Wattanaburanon A, Abdullakasim P, Maharachpong N. Rabies-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices among primary school students in Chonburi Province, Thailand. INQUIRY. 2022:59:00469580221087881. [DOI:10.1177/00469580221087881] [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Hossain M. Study on knowledge, attitude & practice about rabies & pet animals among school children in Bangladesh. J Microbiol Exp. 2017;4(1):1-15. [DOI:10.15406/jmen.2017.04.00103]
28. Lounis M, Zarif M, Zeroug Z, Brahimi SS, Meddour Z. Rabies in the endemic region of Algeria: knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) survey among university students. Animals. 2024;14(15):2193 . [DOI:10.3390/ani14152193] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Azam ME, Bashirian S, Shahanjarini AK, Barati M. Factors associated with intention to perform fecal occult blood test among medical professionals: An application of the protection motivation theory. Govaresh. 2019;24:147-155.
30. Morowatisharifabad MA, Abdolkarimi M, Asadpour M, Fathollahi MS, Balaee P. The predictive effects of protection motivation theory on intention and behaviour of physical activity in patients with type 2 diabetes. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(4): p709. [DOI:10.3889/oamjms.2018.119] [PMID] [PMCID]
31. Tschannen-Moran M,McMaster P. Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. Elem Sch J. 2009;110. [DOI:10.1086/605771] [PMID]
32. Ebadifard-Azar F, Dehdari T, Laka S, Khanipour A. Determinants of intention of dentists for providing dental care to HIV/AIDS-infected patients based on protection motivation theory. Iran J Health Educ Health Promot. 2015;2(4):281-289.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Articles Copyright © The Author(s).
Owned by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.
Published by UMSHA Press
Journal Tel: +98 81 38380090
Publisher Tel: +98 81 38382022
Website: https://psj.umsha.ac.ir/
Email: psj@umsha.ac.ir
