Volume 19, Issue 1 (Pajouhan Scientific Journal, Autumn 2020)
Pajouhan Sci J 2020, 19(1): 16-23 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Cheraghi F, Kalili A, Soltanian A, Eskandarlou M, Sharifian P. The Effect of Visual Aberration on Burn Dressing Replacement Pain in Children Aged 6-12 Years: A Clinical Trial Study. Pajouhan Sci J 2020; 19 (1) :16-23
URL: http://psj.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-607-en.html
URL: http://psj.umsha.ac.ir/article-1-607-en.html
1- Associate Professor, Research Center for (Home Care) Chronic Diseases, Department of Pediatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2- Mother, and Child Care Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3- Professor, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
4- Department of General Surgery, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
5- Pediatric Nursing student, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , rsharifian7@gmail.com
2- Mother, and Child Care Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
3- Professor, Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
4- Department of General Surgery, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
5- Pediatric Nursing student, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , rsharifian7@gmail.com
Abstract: (2569 Views)
Background and Objective: Burn is one of the most common events in childhood. Pain relief in burn patients helps to stabilize the patient's hemodynamic parameters. This study aimed to investigate the effect of visual aberration on dressing replacement pain in children aged 6-12 years.
Materials and Methods: In this one-blind clinical trial with a control group, 80 children aged 6-12 years admitted to the burn ward of Besat Hospital in Hamadan were selected by Available sampling method and then randomly divided into two groups of control and visual aberration. Data were collected using a demographic profile checklist and Usher pain tool. In the visual distraction group, a cartoon of a cat and mouse was broadcast from two minutes before the end of the dressing. In both groups, pain intensity was measured and recorded 10 minutes before dressing, at intervals of two minutes during dressing, and 5 minutes after dressing. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16 software and one-way analysis of variance and analysis of variance with repeated measures.
Results: The results showed that no significant differences were found in the demographic characteristics of children and parents between the two groups of visual distraction and control (P˃0.05). The mean scores of pain intensity at all measurement times between the two groups of visual distraction and The control had a statistically significant difference and in general, the pain intensity score in children in the visual distraction group was lower than the control group (P <0.001).
Conclusion: In general, the results showed that the visual distraction method is effective in reducing the severity of burn pain in children.
Materials and Methods: In this one-blind clinical trial with a control group, 80 children aged 6-12 years admitted to the burn ward of Besat Hospital in Hamadan were selected by Available sampling method and then randomly divided into two groups of control and visual aberration. Data were collected using a demographic profile checklist and Usher pain tool. In the visual distraction group, a cartoon of a cat and mouse was broadcast from two minutes before the end of the dressing. In both groups, pain intensity was measured and recorded 10 minutes before dressing, at intervals of two minutes during dressing, and 5 minutes after dressing. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16 software and one-way analysis of variance and analysis of variance with repeated measures.
Results: The results showed that no significant differences were found in the demographic characteristics of children and parents between the two groups of visual distraction and control (P˃0.05). The mean scores of pain intensity at all measurement times between the two groups of visual distraction and The control had a statistically significant difference and in general, the pain intensity score in children in the visual distraction group was lower than the control group (P <0.001).
Conclusion: In general, the results showed that the visual distraction method is effective in reducing the severity of burn pain in children.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Basic Sciences
Received: 2020/07/20 | Accepted: 2020/09/10 | Published: 2020/09/25
Received: 2020/07/20 | Accepted: 2020/09/10 | Published: 2020/09/25
References
1. Gandhi M, Thomson C, Lord D, Enoch S. Management of pain in children with burns. International journal of pediatrics. 2010. [DOI]
2. Sadeghi Bazargani H, Mohammadi R, Ayubi E, Almasi Hashiani A, Pakzad R, Sullman MJ, et al. Caregiver-related predictors of thermal burn injuries among Iranian children: A case-control study. PloS one. 2017;12(2 ):e0170982. (Persian)
3. Aghaei A, Mehrabi Y, Ramezankhani A, Soori H. Factors related to pediatric Burn in Iran: A Case-Control Study. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2018; 6(6 ):7823-32.
4. Saberi M, Fatemi M, Soroush M, Masoumi M, Niazi M. Burn Epidemiology in Iran: A Meta-Analysis Study. 2016; 24(1 ):47-61. (Persian)
5. Ladwig GB, Ackley BJ, Makic MBF. Mosby's Guide to Nursing Diagnosis E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2019.
6. Vagnoli L, Bettini A, Amore E, De Masi S, Messeri A. Relaxation-guided imagery reduces perioperative anxiety and pain in children: a randomized study. European journal of pediatrics. 2019;178(6 ):913-21.
7. Doenges ME, Moorhouse MF, Murr AC. Nursing care plans: Guidelines for individualizing client care across the life span: FA Davis; 2019.
8. Peate I. A Systematic Approach to Nursing Care. Learning to Care E-Book: The Nursing Associate. 2019:109.
9. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJ, Pandharipande PP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Critical care medicine. 2018;46(9 ):e825-e73
10. Saleh AH, Hassan PF. The prophylactic effect of rectal diclofenac versus intravenous pethidine on postoperative pain after tonsillectomy in children. Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology. 2019;11(1 ):1-7. (Persian)
11. Jiang M, Mieronkoski R, Syrjälä E, Anzanpour A, Terävä V, Rahmani AM, et al. Acute pain intensity monitoring with the classification of multiple physiological parameters. Journal of clinical monitoring and computing. 2019;33(3 ):493-507.
12. Beltramini A, Galinski M, Chabernaud JL, Almenar RR, Tsapis M, Goddet NS, et al. Pain assessment in children younger than 8 years in out-of-hospital emergency medicine: reliability and validity of EVENDOL score. Pediatric emergency care. 2019;35(2):125-31.
13. Self I, Grubb T. Physiology of pain. BSAVA Guide to Pain Management in Small Animal Practice: BSAVA Library; 2019. p. 3-13.
14. Khonsary SA. Guyton and Hall: textbook of medical physiology. Surgical neurology international. 2017.
15. Brand K, Al-Rais A. Pain assessment in children. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine. 2019.
16. Ballantyne JC, Fishman SM, Rathmell JP. Bonica's management of pain: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2018.
17. Pickering G, Zwakhalen S, Kaasalainen S. Pain Management in Older Adults: A Nursing Perspective: Springer; 2018.
18. Edmond SN, Becker WC, Driscoll MA, Decker SE, Higgins DM, Mattocks KM, et al. Use of non-pharmacological pain treatment modalities among veterans with chronic pain: results from a cross-sectional survey. Journal of general internal medicine. 2018;33(1 ):54-60.
19. Khalil NS. Critical care nurses' use of non-pharmacological pain management methods in Egypt. Applied Nursing Research. 2018;44:33-8. (Persian)
20. Shih S, Rosen P. Pain Management for Nasogastric Intubation in Pediatrics. Cureus. 2018;10(10 ): e3429.
21. Atzori B, Hoffman HG, Vagnoli L, Messeri A, Grotto RL. Virtual reality as distraction technique for pain management in children and adolescents. Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in Medicine and Healthcare: IGI Global; 2019. p. 483-9423.
22. Liu Y, Gu Z, Wang Y, Wu Q, Chen V, Xu X, et al. Effect of audiovisual distraction on the management of dental anxiety in children: A systematic review. International journal of paediatric dentistry. 2019;29(1 ):14-21.
23. Indhu Rekka N, Sathiyawathie RS, Gurunathan D. Effect of video-based cartoon distractions in the management of anxiety in children undergoing restorative therapy. Drug Invention Today. 2019;11(4):869-870.
24. Rodriguez ST, Jang O, Hernandez JM, George AJ, Caruso TJ, Simons LE. Varying screen size for passive video distraction during induction of anesthesia in low‐risk children: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Anesthesia. 2019; 29(6 ): 648-655.
25. Kim J, Chiesa N, Raazi M, Wright KD. A systematic review of technology-based preoperative preparation interventions for child and parent anxiety. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie. 2019;66(8 ):966-986.
26. Abd Elnabi H, El-Dakhakhny A, Fikry Mehanna A. Effect of Distraction Techniques on Minimizing Pain Associated With Burn Dressing Changes among Preschool Children. IOSR-JNHS. 2018;7(2 ):64-78.
27. Kaheni S, Sadegh Rezai M, Bagheri-Nesami M, Goudarzian AH. The effect of Distraction Technique on the pain of Dressing change among 3-6 year-old children. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;4(4 ):1603-10. (Persian)
28. Sinha M, Christopher NC, Fenn R, Reeves L. Evaluation of nonpharmacologic methods of pain and anxiety management for laceration repair in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 2006;117(4 ):1162-8.
29. Yoo H, Kim S, Hur H-K, Kim H-S. The effects of an animation distraction intervention on pain response of preschool children during venipuncture. Applied Nursing Research. 2011;24(2 ):94-100.
30. Mikaeili N, Fathi A, Kanani S, Samadifard H. A Comparison of Distraction Techniques (Bubble and Cartoon ) On Reducing Chemotherapy induced pain in children with Cancer. Iranian Journal of Cancer Care. 2019;1(1 ):15-23.
31. Ikaeili N, Fathi A, Kanani S, Samadifard H. A Comparison of Distraction Techniques (Bubble and Cartoon ) On Reducing Chemotherapy induced pain in children with Cancer. 2019;1(1 ):15-23.
32. Hua Y, Qiu R, Yao W-y, Zhang Q, Chen X-l. The effect of virtual reality distraction on pain relief during dressing changes in children with chronic wounds on lower limbs. Pain Management Nursing. 2015;16(5 ):685-91.
33. Brown NJ, Rodger S, Ware RS, Kimble RM, Cuttle L. Efficacy of a children’s procedural preparation and distraction device on healing in acute burn wound care procedures: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012;13(1 ):238.
34. Landolt MA, Marti D, Widmer J, Meuli M. Does cartoon movie distraction decrease burned children's pain behavior? The Journal of burn care & rehabilitation. 2002;23(1 ):61-5.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Articles Copyright © The Author(s).
Owned by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.
Published by UMSHA Press
Journal Tel: +98 81 38380090
Publisher Tel: +98 81 38382022
Website: https://psj.umsha.ac.ir/
Email: psj@umsha.ac.ir
